Back to Evidence Hub
Case Study S006
2019 Release

Dehkordi 2019: SCG for CAD Screening

Parastoo Dehkordi et al.
Access Paper

Quick Conclusion: Examines the diagnostic performance of SCG in CAD screening, observing results comparable to stress-echocardiography in this cohort.


📊 Key Accuracy Metrics

MetricResult
Rest Model Accuracy74% (Sensitivity 75%, Specificity 72%)
Exercise Model Accuracy81% (Sensitivity 82%, Specificity 84%)
Exercise SCG AUC0.91
ECG Stress Test Accuracy65% (in the same cohort)


🔍 Study Analysis

Objective & Population

Observational / Validation Study with Exercise Stress Test. Cohort: 180 individuals (117 with significant CAD >=50% stenosis, 63 controls) (N=180).

What it Supports

Reports 81% diagnostic accuracy for exercise SCG in detecting obstructive CAD (>=50% stenosis) compared to angiography.

What it Does Not Support

The study does not support the localization of stenosis (where the blockage is), but rather its presence and severity. It is not a complete replacement for invasive angiography but a powerful gatekeeper.


🛠 Technical Context

Featured Illustration

No caption found automatically.

Study Snapshot

Metadata Summary

Target Population

180 individuals (117 with significant CAD >=50% stenosis, 63 controls)

N

Sample Size

180 Subjects

Validated Metric

74% (Sensitivity 75%, Specificity 72%)

Critical Appraisal
supporting

Validated rest and exercise SCG for CAD screening with accuracy superior to stress-ECG.