Back to Evidence Hub
Case Study lubdubdecoder-bringing-micro-mechanical-cardiac-monitoring-to-hearables
2025 Release

LubDubDecoder: Bringing Micro-Mechanical Cardiac Monitoring to Hearables

Executive Summary

This study introduces LubDubDecoder, a novel system that transforms hearables into tools for monitoring micro-mechanical cardiac vibrations, specifically SCG and GCG signals, using built-in speakers and microphones. The system achieves high correlations (0.88–0.95) with chest-mounted reference measurements in a feasibility study with 25 participants and demonstrates robustness across different hearable designs, remounting sessions, and music playback. Clinical implications include enabling hands-free, everyday cardiovascular monitoring, potentially improving early detection and management of heart conditions.

This study shows how regular earbuds can monitor heart health by detecting subtle vibrations linked to heartbeats, offering a convenient way to track cardiovascular health daily.

Answer Machine Insights

Q: What is the primary innovation of LubDubDecoder?

The system repurposes built-in speakers in hearables to capture and reconstruct SCG and GCG signals, enabling cardiac monitoring across a wide range of devices.

Our key insight is that the familiar 'lub-dub' sounds of the heart beating can be measured from the ear and leveraged to reconstruct the fine-grained SCG and GCG waveforms.

Q: How does the system handle variability across different hearables?

It uses a zero-effort normalization strategy that aligns signals from new devices with a reference device, enabling generalization without explicit user calibration.

To generalize to new hearable devices not seen during training, we apply a zero-effort normalization strategy that does not require any explicit calibration effort by the user.

Key Results

  • Achieved Pearson correlations of 0.88–0.95 with chest-mounted reference measurements.

  • Zero-effort adaptation scheme generalized across hearables with a correlation of 0.91.

Visual Evidence

Figure 3: Challenge of conventional IMU-based micro-cardiac measurements. Differences in sensor placement lead to vari- ations in waveforms, making comparisons across repeated measurements challenging. Precise and consistent placement is difficult to ensure when measurements are performed by lay users outside clinical settings. Each waveform cor- responds to a cycle of 800 ms, and amplitudes are normalized to their own maximum.

Figure 3: Challenge of conventional IMU-based micro-cardiac measurements. Differences in sensor placement lead to vari- ations in waveforms, making comparisons across repeated measurements challenging. Precise and consistent placement is difficult to ensure when measurements are performed by lay users outside clinical settings. Each waveform cor- responds to a cycle of 800 ms, and amplitudes are normalized to their own maximum.