Back to Evidence Hub
Case Study evaluating-seismocardiography-as-a-non-exercise-method-for-estimating-maximal-oxygen-uptake
2024 Release

Evaluating Seismocardiography as a Non-Exercise Method for Estimating Maximal Oxygen Uptake

Executive Summary

This study validates the Seismofit®, a novel seismocardiography-based device, for non-exercise estimation of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2MAX) in a cohort of 94 healthy subjects. The device demonstrated high correlation (r = 0.834) with traditional cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and acceptable accuracy (mean average percentage error of 11.2–11.4%). Intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.993 indicate excellent test-retest reliability, making the Seismofit® a promising tool for general health assessments and cardiorespiratory fitness monitoring.

This study shows that the Seismofit® device can estimate fitness levels (VO2MAX) without exercise, offering a simpler alternative to traditional lab tests with good accuracy and reliability.

Answer Machine Insights

Q: How accurate is the Seismofit® compared to CPET?

The Seismofit® demonstrated a high correlation (r = 0.834) with CPET and an acceptable mean average percentage error of 11.2–11.4%.

The correlation between the CPET and the Seismofit® was r = 0.834 and r = 0.832 for the two first estimates, and the mean average percentage error was 11.4% and 11.2%.

Q: What is the repeatability of the Seismofit® measurements?

The Seismofit® showed excellent test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.993.

Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated excellent test-retest reliability between the two first recordings with ICC value at 0.993.

Key Results

  • Correlation between Seismofit® and CPET VO2MAX was r = 0.834.

  • Mean average percentage error (MAPE) for Seismofit® estimates was 11.2–11.4%.

Visual Evidence

Figure 1. The study protocol. After enrolment two Seismofit® recordings were obtained with 5-min intervals before the CPEP test. A third Seismofit® recording was obtained 5 min after the CPET test.

Figure 1. The study protocol. After enrolment two Seismofit® recordings were obtained with 5-min intervals before the CPEP test. A third Seismofit® recording was obtained 5 min after the CPET test.

Clinical Snapshot

Evidence Rating

Relevance

high Priority

Confidence

Supporting

Relativity Score

4/5
Rigor
4/5
Novelty
5/5
Impact

Semantic Graph Connections

Similar Methodology

SEISMIC-HF 1: key findings from AHA24 and implications for remote cardiac monitoring

Similar Methodology

Monitoring of respiration and cardiorespiratory interactions from multichannel seismocardiography signals

Similar Methodology

Estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy using seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

Accuracy of a Clinical Applicable Method for Prediction of VO2max Using Seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

Non-exercise estimation of peak oxygen uptake in patients with ischaemic heart disease and heart failure using seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

Validity and reliability of a clinical non-exercise method for assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness using seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

Robustness of Persistence Diagrams to Time-Delay for Seismocardiogram Signal Quality Assessment*

Similar Methodology

Heartbeat Detection in Seismocardiograms with Semantic Segmentation

Similar Methodology

Performance Analysis of Gyroscope and Accelerometer Sensors for Seismocardiography-Based Wearable Pre-Ejection Period Estimation

Similar Methodology

A Unified Framework for Quality Indexing and Classification of Seismocardiogram Signals

Similar Methodology

Non-Invasive Wearable Patch Utilizing Seismocardiography for Peri-Operative Use in Surgical Patients

Similar Methodology

Automatic Detection of Seismocardiogram Sensor Misplacement for Robust Pre-Ejection Period Estimation in Unsupervised Settings

Similar Methodology

Universal Pre-Ejection Period Estimation Using Seismocardiography: Quantifying the Effects of Sensor Placement and Regression Algorithms

Similar Methodology

BIOWISH: Biometric Recognition using Wearable Inertial Sensors detecting Heart Activity

Similar Methodology

Wearable Seismocardiography‐Based Assessment of Stroke Volume in Congenital Heart Disease

Similar Methodology

The acceptability of a novel seismocardiography device for measuring VO2 max in a workplace setting: a mixed methods approach

Similar Methodology

Determining the Respiratory State From a Seismocardiographic Signal--A Machine Learning Approach

Similar Methodology

Visualization of the Multichannel Seismocardiogram

Similar Methodology

Determination of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Using Seismocardiography at Rest

Similar Methodology

Seismocardiography for Emotion Recognition: A Study on EmoWear with Insights from DEAP