Back to Evidence Hub
Case Study influence-of-gravitational-offset-removal-on-heart-beat-detection-performance-from-android-smartphone-seismocardiograms
2018 Release

Influence of Gravitational Offset Removal on Heart Beat Detection Performance from Android Smartphone Seismocardiograms

Executive Summary

This study evaluates the impact of gravitational offset removal on heart beat detection performance using seismocardiograms (SCG) recorded via Android smartphones. The proposed algorithm employs band-pass filtering, RMS envelope computation, and peak detection to identify heart beats. Results show high detection accuracy (Se = 0.990, PPV = 0.948), with RMS envelope outperforming analytical envelope. Gravitational offset removal had minimal influence due to preprocessing steps, suggesting the algorithm's robustness across axes and conditions.

This study shows that smartphones can accurately detect heartbeats using vibrations from the chest, even without removing gravitational effects, thanks to advanced signal processing techniques.

Answer Machine Insights

Q: Does gravitational offset removal significantly affect heart beat detection performance?

No, gravitational offset removal has an insignificant impact due to band-pass filtering.

We observed insignificant influence of gravitational offset removal on proposed beat detection algorithm because of band-pass signal filtering.

Q: Which envelope type performed better for heart beat detection?

RMS envelope performed better than analytical envelope.

Using RMS envelope improves the detection quality of proposed algorithm, which suggests choosing that type of envelope for next studies.

Key Results

  • Sensitivity (Se) = 0.990 and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) = 0.948 for all beats.

  • Using RMS envelope improves detection performance compared to analytical envelope.

Visual Evidence

Fig. 1. SCG vs. ECG by Ghufran Shafiq et al. Image retrieved from [12]. License: CC-BY 4.0. Part (a) shows raw SCG signal (above) and ECG signal (below). Part (b) presents annotated SCG and ECG ensemble averages (dark lines) and superimposed SCG and ECG beats (light shades).

Fig. 1. SCG vs. ECG by Ghufran Shafiq et al. Image retrieved from [12]. License: CC-BY 4.0. Part (a) shows raw SCG signal (above) and ECG signal (below). Part (b) presents annotated SCG and ECG ensemble averages (dark lines) and superimposed SCG and ECG beats (light shades).

Clinical Snapshot

Evidence Rating

Relevance

high Priority

Confidence

Supporting

Relativity Score

3/5
Rigor
3/5
Novelty
4/5
Impact

Semantic Graph Connections

Similar Methodology

Heart Beat Detection from Smartphone SCG Signals: Comparison with Previous Study on HR Estimation

Similar Methodology

Heart Rate Variability Analysis on Reference Heart Beats and Detected Heart Beats of Smartphone Seismocardiograms

Similar Methodology

Multiclass Classifier based Cardiovascular Condition Detection Using Smartphone Mechanocardiography

Similar Methodology

Non-contact heart vibration measurement using computer vision-based seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

From video to vital signs: a new method for contactless multichannel seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

Estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy using seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

Robustness of Persistence Diagrams to Time-Delay for Seismocardiogram Signal Quality Assessment*

Similar Methodology

Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate Monitoring Using Seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

Heartbeat Detection in Seismocardiograms with Semantic Segmentation

Similar Methodology

Beat-to-beat estimation of LVET and QS2 indices of cardiac mechanics from wearable seismocardiography in ambulant subjects

Similar Methodology

Effect of Normal Breathing and Breath Holding on Seismocardiographic Signals and Heart Rate

Similar Methodology

A Hidden Markov Model for Seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

Waveform Similarity Analysis Using Graph Mining for the Optimization of Sensor Positioning in Wearable Seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

High-Accuracy, Unsupervised Annotation of Seismocardiogram Traces for Heart Rate Monitoring

Similar Methodology

A new algorithm for segmentation of cardiac quiescent phases and cardiac time intervals using seismocardiography

Similar Methodology

Visualization of the Multichannel Seismocardiogram

Similar Methodology

Revolutionizing smartphone gyrocardiography for heart rate monitoring: overcoming clinical validation hurdles

Similar Methodology

ECG-Free Heartbeat Detection in Seismocardiography Signals via Template Matching

Similar Methodology

Comparison of Seismocardiography Based Heart Rate Measurement Method